1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs (appointed parties) and the designated parties are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The former 574 square meters of G was divided into 574 square meters, and the former 531 square meters of G and the former 43 square meters of G, and the former 43 square meters of G was closed as of September 20, 1947.

B. On September 11, 1948, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer under the name of the Defendant on February 4, 1976 on the land B (hereinafter “instant land”).

C. D was killed on July 19, 2012, while the instant lawsuit was pending, and the heir took over the instant lawsuit by the son I, Appointer J, K, and L, who are her husband, as her husband.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 9 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. On July 31, 1958, the Plaintiff’s Plaintiff’s assertion and the Plaintiff’s representative acquired ownership under the Farmland Reform Act after completing redemption on July 31, 1958, and then succeeded to the registration of ownership transfer on the ground that the Plaintiff and the designated person completed reimbursement on July 234, 1958, the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff did not receive the registration of ownership transfer on the ground that the Plaintiff and the designated person completed reimbursement on July 31, 1958, with respect to the land in this case, the portion 11, 5, 6, 7, 16, 15, 15, 14, 14, 13, 12, and 11, indicated in the separate sheet among the land in this case.

B. We examine the judgment of the court of this case. The result of the request of the court of first instance for surveying and appraisal on the branch offices of the Korea Intellectual Property Office, which were not held by the court of first instance, included the following facts and circumstances that were acknowledged by considering the results of the fact inquiry and the overall purport of the pleadings by the court of first instance, i.e., the distribution of H G 234 in the redemption ledger, but on the other hand, the said G lot number was not existing at the time, and thus, in the remarks column of the redemption ledger.