logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.10.25 2013노526
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (a fine of five million won) declared by the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the Defendant, like the instant criminal facts, immediately stops and did not take necessary measures after causing a traffic accident, and the conflict between the white part of other automobiles during the course of escape, and the fact that the Defendant did not agree with the victims is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

However, in full view of the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime in depth and did not repeat again, and that there is no other criminal records except that the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won as a result of the violation of the Road Traffic Act on October 16, 1999, and that there is no other criminal records, and all other sentencing conditions in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is too uneasible.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow