The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that D who was appointed and posted by the victim C Co., Ltd., the managing body of the above apartment complex management office in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu around July 11, 2017, as the managing body of the apartment complex management office, intends to enter the management office, and it is not necessary to have the managing office sent by C in order for E to perform the duties of the managing office.

The Director of the Management Office shall be elected directly by us.

“To prevent the said D from entering the management office,” the said D from entering the management office.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim B apartment management business by force.

2. The following facts are examined: (a) whether the Defendant was able to prevent D from entering the office of management on July 11, 2017, as indicated in the facts charged; (b) whether there is a fact that D from entering the office of management; and (c) the witness F’s statements in this court and in the investigative agency are hard to believe, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge them (the witness F had, in this court, D from the attorney’s cross-examination on July 11, 2017 to the management office at the time of 2-3 p.m.

The statement was reversed, and the witness D was present at the management office from July 12, 2017 to the management office, and at the time the defendant was not present at the time).3. As such, the facts charged in the instant case constitute a time when there is no proof of crime, and thus, the summary of the judgment of innocence is not publicly notified pursuant to the proviso of Article 58(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act.