logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.12.07 2018고단3272
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant served as an employee of the Do retail Trade Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “B”) of the Plaintiff’s return of the Plaintiff’s operation in Daejeon Pungdong-gu B and Dong 1, and was in charge of the entry and exit of goods in stores and warehouses from August 2016 to November 2016, and the distribution and sale of goods from December 31, 2016 to January 31, 2018.

1. A thief: (a) around June 16, 2017, the Defendant shall take up 20,000 won in cash owned by the victim in a closed-end credit cooperative, in which there is no gap in the said closed-end store.

From that time to June 26, 2017, a total of KRW 130,00,000 from that time by the same method, such as the one copy of the list of crimes in the attached Form 1.

They go back.

Accordingly, the Defendant stolen the property owned by the victim.

2. From December 2016, the Defendant is engaged in the business of distributing and selling the said company’s goods to the transaction partners from around December 2016, and there is a duty to prepare a transaction statement as the goods supplied to the transaction partners.

Nevertheless, on May 1, 2017, the Defendant, in breach of his/her duties, supplied companion animal-related goods worth KRW 1,698,700 in total supplied to “E”, which is the business partner, and supplied only the goods worth KRW 1,305,80,00, to the said company for free. Moreover, the Defendant supplied goods worth KRW 392,00 in total to the business partner at least 15,364,410 in total by the same method until January 25, 2018 as shown in attached Table 2 of the List of Crimes.

As a result, the defendant has acquired property benefits equivalent to 15,364,410 won in total from customers in violation of occupational duties, and has inflicted damages equivalent to the same amount on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to C;

1. Data on details of transactions, data on investigation reports (related to data submitted by complainants), and data on details of transactions;

1. The application of the law of investigation report (organization of the list of crimes of occupational breach of trust, hearing of victim's statement) 1.

arrow