The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant had been driving a breater on the Defendant’s vehicle parked in order to avoid drilling while waiting for an engineer on behalf of the Defendant at the time of the instant case, and was diving.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, ① although the defendant was found to have made three times a call to a proxy driving company at the time of the instant case, it is difficult to view that the defendant had driven a short distance while waiting for a proxy driving engineer, and ② the defendant argued that he was parked in the crosswalk at the front of the Daejeon Western Branch, which had been left by the defendant since 18:00 p.m. before the instant case, but according to CCTV video installed within the Daejeon Western Branch, it is confirmed that he did not park any vehicle at the front of the church until 17:01:5:13 on November 2012, 201, it is difficult to view that the proxy driving company was parked in front of the church at the present site, but according to the on-site photographs, it is difficult to view that the proxy driving company was not parked at the front of the front of the front branch of the Daejeon Branch. However, according to the CCTV at the same time, the defendant's allegation that the proxy driving machine was not parked at the same level as the above.