The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant conspired with D, the father of the Defendant, and distributed 17 copies of the authentic statement, stating that “(b) the morality of the Director E and the suspicion points (b) of the principal of the principal of the principal of the principal of the principal of the principal of the principal of the principal of the principal’s sexual assault, thereby impairing the reputation of the victim E by openly pointing out facts, while serving as a professor of the principal of the principal of the principal of the principal of the principal of the principal of the principal of the principal’s sexual assault, and as a professor of the issue of 2 million won and compensation for eight million won, by distributing 17 copies of the authentic statement, stating that “(vi)” is a professor of the case of sexual assault and compensation for the damage of 2 million won and 8 million won,” at around February 10, 2013.

2. In conclusion, the above facts charged constitute a crime falling under Article 307(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act.

However, according to the records, the victim can recognize the fact that he/she has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on November 5, 2013, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.