A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

No person who conducts public morals business shall allow another person to view obscene video products, etc.

Nevertheless, on September 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) posted a site list to “E” chro chro chro chro chro chro chro chro chro chro chro chro chro chro chro chro chro chro chro chro chro chro chro chro chro chro chro chro chro ero chro chro chro chro ero chro chro chro ero chro chro chro chro chro ero chro chro chro chro ero chro chro ero chro chro chro ero chro chro ero chro chro ero chro chro ero chro chro ero ero

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A report on investigation (with regard to the details of enforcement) and a photograph of the enforcement site;

1. Application of an inquiry letter, such as criminal history, and reporting on the result of confirmation before and after the disposition;

1. Article 10 of the Act on the Regulation of Preliminary Business, and Articles 10 (2) and 3 of the Act on the Regulation of Preliminary Business, and Selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the issue of the main text of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding the cost of lawsuit is that customers freely view obscene materials while using the Internet, and that they did not allow the defendant to view obscene materials as stated in the facts charged of this case.

The following circumstances acknowledged by this Court based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, i.e., the Defendant, while running a business with the trade name “D”, entered the “personal studio preparation” in the entrance, etc., and the “ adult dynamic image” in the entrance.