A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 28, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Ulsan District Court on July 28, 2008; on March 14, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents; the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 8 months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act;

Despite the fact that the Defendant had been punished for drinking driving twice or more, on September 16, 2013, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.080% without a driver’s license on September 16, 2013, and operated the three-lane road in front of the modern vehicle in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., by driving the said vehicle at a speed of 50km per hour depending on two-lanes in the front of the modern vehicle located in the same Dong at the port of delivery of the modern vehicle.

At all times, there are a lot of traffic of vehicles and traffic signals on the front side, so the defendant engaged in driving motor vehicles had a duty of care to reduce the speed and to keep the movement of other vehicles that are in progress on the signal lights and the front side from accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded without reducing speed in front, and did not discover the E-chip car driven by the victim D (hereinafter referred to as 46 years old) who stops in accordance with the stop signal in the same direction, and did not discover the said X-chisp car as the front part of the above EX car, and led the victim F (hereinafter referred to as 28 years old) who stops in the front side of the car to get the car driven by the victim F (n, 28 years old), and again, the said E-chis car was driven by the victim H (ma, 44 years old).

Ultimately, the Defendant, at the above occupational negligence, is an essential chronon, chronon that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the Victim K, who was accompanied by a vehicle driven by D, D, F, H, and H (V, 42 years old) operated by the victim J (ma, South Korea), F, H, and H.