1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Facts without dispute;

A. From April 16, 2015 to March 19, 2017, the Plaintiff lent KRW 11,150,000 to the Defendant six times as indicated in the following table:

(1) The term “the instant loan” refers to the term “the instant loan” and, in cases where each of the loans is specified, the term is equal to the term “the first loan”). The temporary principal is 2,000,000 on April 16, 2015; and the term is 2,000,000,000 on March 22, 2016, 200 on September 22, 2015; and 1,50,000,000 on July 1, 2016, 200 on July 1, 2016, 2016; and 1,000,000,000 on March 1, 2017; and

B. From May 5, 2015 to August 2017, the Defendant repaid to the Plaintiff the sum of KRW 10,946,163 as the principal and interest of each of the above loans.

2. Determination

A. (1) The plaintiff asserts that as the cause of the claim in this case, the plaintiff agreed on the rate of overdue interest and overdue interest rate as indicated below with respect to each of the above loans, and the amount repaid by the defendant is insufficient to fully satisfy the principal and interest of each of the above loans. Thus, if the defendant pays the principal and interest in order of payment of the principal and interest, the remaining principal and interest shall be the total of KRW 4,224,896 (the remaining principal and interest shall be the total of KRW 3,776,880) as of December 6, 2017, and the defendant is obliged to pay the remaining principal and interest and interest and delay damages in accordance with the overdue interest rate on the remaining principal.

Notwithstanding 4,00,000 29,000 00 0 0. 2, 209 34.9% on April 16, 2015, 200 on April 16, 2015, 200 34.9% on September 2, 2015, 327,962 376,904 376 376, 863, 207. 86. 86. 9% on March 22, 2016, 207. 9% on June 3, 207, 207, 207. 9% on June 16, 207, 207, 306. 9% on June 6, 207, 205, 207. 9% on July 19, 2016.