logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.02.03 2016고단3177
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

2016 order 4657

1. On May 201, the Defendant against the victim E is to work as a celebrists from G in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, and to the victim who became aware of the customer as the customer “I will pay two copies of interest if I will lend the victim with the interest with the interest with the interest with the intention to pay it every month, and the principal shall be repaid with the balance.

“.....”

However, the Defendant, at the time, was registered as bad credit holders due to bad credit standing and was liable for a debt of 200 million won or more. On the other hand, the Defendant, in the form of a “return prohibition” in which a person bears a new obligation due to absence of any special property, was liable for interest at a high interest rate, and thus, did not have any intent or ability to pay the interest even if he borrowed money from the injured person.

On May 31, 201, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 8 million from the victim to the deposit account in the name of H, Dong-in, No. 3333, May 31, 201.

In addition, the Defendant received a total of KRW 300,970,000 from the injured party over 65 times in total, as shown in the list of offenses (1) from March 15, 2016, from that time until March 15, 2016.

2. The criminal defendant against the victim I would have to pay the victim with money that he/she became aware of with the customer at the place specified in paragraph (2) around February 2014. The defendant would have to pay the victim with money that he/she had to use in his/her house.

“.....”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay even if he borrowed money from the damaged person, such as Paragraph 2.

On February 8, 2014, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 5 million from the victim to the deposit account in H’s name on the pretext of borrowing money.

In addition, the Defendant received, from that time until December 17, 2015, a total amount of KRW 82,175,000 from the damaged persons over 20 times, as shown in the List of Offenses (2).

3. The criminal defendant against the victim J on September 2014.

arrow