logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2020.07.09 2019가단21030
대여금
Text

1. The defendant extended loans to the plaintiff, which the non-party C raised against the defendant, to the Seoul Northern District Court 2010Kadan27783.

Reasons

1. As indicated in the grounds for claim indicated in the attached Form indicating the claim, the Plaintiff may seek confirmation as to whether a judicial claim for interruption of prescription exists against the claim established by judgment as a person who has been lawfully transferred by C the claim for the judgment as set forth in Paragraph 1 of the Disposition against C against the Defendant, and may achieve the purpose of interruption of prescription.

Therefore, there is a benefit to seek confirmation.

2. Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 208 (3) 2 and Article 150 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act (Judgment on deemed as Confession);

arrow