1. The Defendants are jointly and severally and severally liable to the Plaintiff for 34,300,697 won and the period from December 1, 2014 to November 13, 2015.

1. Basic facts

A. On April 14, 2014, the Plaintiff, a corporation operating a temporary leasing business, entered into a lease agreement with Defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “A”) on a monthly and cash settlement method on the construction site of the new building in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as “the instant lease agreement”). Under the instant lease agreement, the Plaintiff supplied the instant temporary materials by November 10, 2014 pursuant to the instant lease agreement.

B. Meanwhile, at the time of the instant lease agreement with Defendant A, the Plaintiff agreed to be paid a total of KRW 23,012,328 of the temporary site rent incurred in the construction site of the E-sports Center at the time of the instant lease agreement with Defendant A along with the temporary site rent of this case

(hereinafter referred to as “instant rental agreement”). C.

At the time of the instant lease agreement, Defendant B and C jointly and severally guaranteed the Defendant A’s obligation to pay rent according to the instant lease agreement and the rental contract.

The temporary materials rent of this case supplied by the Plaintiff to Defendant A according to the instant lease agreement is KRW 48,048,969, and the Plaintiff received a total of KRW 36,760,60,600 from Defendant A by August 2014 as the temporary materials rent of this case and the contract amount for the lease of this case.

[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute between the parties, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 6 (including each number), witness F's testimony, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the determination as to the cause of the claim, barring any special circumstance, the Defendants jointly and severally conflict with the Plaintiff as to the existence and scope of the obligation of the instant case from December 1, 2014 to December 13, 2015, which is deemed reasonable for the Defendants to dispute as to the existence and scope of the obligation of the instant case, as sought by the Plaintiff.