1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 38,00,000 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from June 24, 2016 to the day of complete payment.

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff and the Defendant were legally married couple who completed the marriage report on September 20, 1982. However, on August 201, 201, the Plaintiff and the Defendant filed an application for divorce by agreement, and filed a divorce report on December 12, 201.

On September 21, 2011, the Plaintiff and the Defendant drafted a cash custody certificate (hereinafter “instant 1 cash custody certificate”) with the following content.

B Japan,00 million won is A, and Party A (hereinafter “A”) appears to be the clerical error of “B”. From 2013 to May 5, 2013, Party A and Party A also drafted a cash storage certificate (hereinafter “the cash storage certificate of this case”) with the following content as of September 21, 201, with a total of KRW 3 million,000,000,0000,000,000,000 in cash loan from Korea bank loaned from Korea.

B. A is the fall short of KRW 200,000,000 per annum of Jan. 5, 2013 (which appears to be a clerical error in the “from the beginning”) with the amount written without scambling KRW 50,000 on Apr. 5, 2011, and KRW 200,000 per annum (which seems to be a clerical error in the “repaid”) with the loans from the Bank of Korea (which seems to be a clerical error in the “repaid”). It does not appear to be a clerical error in the “repaid” after September 21, 2011, subject to the condition that the amount would be repaid (which appears to be a clerical error in the “repaid”).

If he/she seems to be a fluorant of his/her flusium, a cash custody certificate shall be invalid.

A On October 29, 2011, the Plaintiff and the Defendant drafted each of the following descriptions (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant notes”).

Since each writing, 6 millions from March 201, 201, 2000,000 D was a false end-up B.

From 2013, A is the starting point.

(B) From 2013 to 2013, the amount of one million won in one year is deemed to have been paid (the clerical error in the amount of full payment). A, in total, O-O (O is not reading), on January 5, 2013, KRW 5,000,000,000 (O appears to be a clerical error in the amount of full payment) [the grounds for recognition], and there is no dispute as to Gap’s evidence 1-3.