The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal (deficial scenarios) is that the court below acquitted the Defendant on the part of the victim on the ground that the Defendant’s act of having the victim her butt her butt was not likely to reach the degree of indecent act by force. However, given the characteristics of the indecent act by force, it is sufficient to evaluate the Defendant’s act itself as an indecent act by force. Thus, the court below erred in the misunderstanding

2. Determination:

A. On July 30, 2013, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force against a juvenile, such as finding out the victim D (n, 13 years of age) who had been living in the old urology at the front of Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, with a view to inducing indecent acts against such female, and harming the victim’s left shoulder with the Defendant’s shoulder, keeping the victim’s shoulder, keeping the victim’s back, and putting the victim’s back, and putting the Defendant’s her her her her her her her son face with the victim for a long time.

B. The lower court found the Defendant not guilty of the facts charged of the instant case on the ground that there is no sufficient evidence to acknowledge the Defendant’s indecent act, taking into account the following: (a) the Defendant was her her traw, her traw, etc. her traw, and the Defendant did not engage in any additional behavior, such as her traw in the body of the victim; (b) the Defendant did not engage in sexual penology with the victim at the time; (c) the Defendant reported her her her her her her flock with the victim; and (d) the Defendant was in the state of her her her her flock; (d) the physical part of the victim’s her her her her her her part was flick around the lower part; (e) the Defendant was her her part, such as sound, chest, and her her her her flock; and (e) the Defendant was a her part of the victim.

(c).