logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.01.31 2017고단1582
절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) cut off the “E” restaurant operated by the victim DD in Daegu-gu, Seogu, Daegu-gu, on June 3, 2017; (b) on the left-hand side of the entrance of the said restaurant, the Defendant 1 and a certified plastic bag prepared in advance a number of 70,000,00 won of the market value of the victim’s ownership, which was displayed on the left-hand side of the entrance of the said restaurant.

On October 8, 2017, 2017, the Defendant: (a) cut off the area of G restaurant in front of the G restaurant in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu; (b) the market price of the victim H, the victim of which is the victim’s ownership; and (c) the Defendant cut off 1 glue and glue of trees.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 1582"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D "2017 Highest 2699";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of statutes on police statements made to H to H;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment and punishment for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for the observation of protection and observation has the history of criminal punishment for the same crime several times, and the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case at the same time. Meanwhile, various circumstances revealed in the arguments of this case, such as the fact that the defendant was committed each of the crimes of this case, the fact that the defendant was aware of each of the crimes of this case, the damage was entirely returned, and the victims agreed smoothly with the victims

arrow