Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. Special intimidation Defendant: (a) on August 20, 2020, on the ground that the Victim D (M, 42 years old) who is the Defendant’s wife in the petition Section B and C (M, 42 years old) was stuffed by the Defendant on August 20, 2020; and (b) on the ground that the Defendant was frighted with the Defendant, the Defendant was frightd with the Defendant;

Where in anywhere shes;

Whether there is a good place or not, so far as there is a good place or not.

The term “to die” and “to die” and to the effect that the knife ( approximately 32 cm in total length, approximately 21 cm in knife: 21 cm in length), which are dangerous objects in the kitchen at the location of the kitchen, was threatened by the victim and the victim.

2. On August 20, 2020, the Defendant: (a) while drinking alcohol with the victim at the place described in paragraph (1) around 16:20 on August 20, 202 with the victim at around 1, 2020; (b) the Defendant said the victim D, “hinging to drinking alcohol, as it is withdrawn from drinking only; and (c) the victim’s “hing to drinking alcohol.”

whether or not

On the ground of the answer, the victim was pushed ahead of his her seat with her seat and head, and the body part of the victim in a number of times, resulting in the victim's injury, such as the cutting of the left inside and the inner wall, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written diagnosis of injury to the witnessD’s legal statement;

1. Photographs of victims and criminal tools;

1. Photographs of the victim;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 284, 283(1) (a) of the Criminal Act (a point of special intimidation), Article 257(1) (a) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Although it is not good for the Defendant to commit a crime of violence against the Defendant’s wife for the reason of sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, each of the crimes of this case is recognized by the Defendant, and the Defendant reflects the mistake by recognizing each of the crimes of this case, and it does not repeat again, and it does not lead to the Defendant’s life faithfully for all of his/her family members, including his/her children, and is the victim.