Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

On February 1, 2017, around 07:09, the Defendant: (a) on the road in front of Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangju, without any special reason; (b) on the road in front of the road, the Defendant flaged the part of the driver’s seat of the EMW passenger vehicle owned by the victim D, with the vehicle keys possessed by the Defendant, so that the Defendant flag off the color of the above victim’s vehicle, and 917,190 won in total, including public rent, can be said to be repair costs.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged another person's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. A criminal investigation report (Confirmation ofCCTV image data);

1. A written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the results of viewing and listening to each CCTV image;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. According to Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order [Along with the result of each CCTV video reproduction viewing (No. 28 No. 5 of the evidence list), it can be confirmed that the Defendant’s hand-on on the front side of the victim’s vehicle immediately adjacent to the victim’s vehicle.

In addition, the CCTV images were examined as soon as possible before discovering the country from which the vehicle was parked, and considering the victim D’s legal statement (it can be sufficiently reliable in light of the contents of the statement, attitude of the statement, etc.) to the effect that only the defendant left the vehicle next to the vehicle, and the form of damage to the victim’s vehicle which is confirmed in photographs bound on the 35th page and 36th page of the evidence record, the fact that the defendant damaged the victim’s vehicle in the same manner as the criminal facts stated in the judgment can be sufficiently recognized).