A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 16, 2017, around 20:45, the Defendant damaged property by spraying the victim D (59 tax) located in Jeju-si, E’s entertainment week operated by E (59) to the employees’ horses that the waiting time may extend within the entertainment week, and thereby, damaged the Defendant’s property by planting 10,000 won of the market price, which is the victim’s possession on the entertainment destination destination.

2. On the same day, at around 21:00 as indicated in paragraph (1), the Defendant: (a) took the hump to F, an employee, for the said reasons at the place specified in paragraph (1) on the same day; (b) destroyed the calculating machine as described in paragraph (1); and (c) destroyed the hump to the hump’s left part of F by hand and the hump to the hump; and (d) obstructed the victim D’s operation of the amusement shop by force for about 15 minutes, such as taking the paper and hump to F on the hump to the hump.

3. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, on the date and time, at the place specified in paragraph 2, paragraphs 1 and 2, and on the same grounds, by the slope H belonging to the G District in the Jeju Dong Police Station G District in the Jeju Dong-dong Police Station that was dispatched after being reported to 112, confirms the Defendant’s personal information, and whether H “I have become governance, immediately and immediately embling,” and

An act of assaulting a police officer to take the left chests of H one time in drinking, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the prevention, suppression, and investigation of a crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. A written statement of I and J;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties), and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including observation of protection and community service order;

1. One kind of crime (Interference with the execution of official duties) of the scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing criteria, which interferes with the execution of official duties;