logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2016.04.01 2015고단1686
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 4, 2010, the Defendant concluded a credit guarantee agreement with the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund for loans for corporate purchase within the limit of one billion won and entered into a credit guarantee agreement issued by the said Credit Guarantee Fund (hereinafter “victim bank”) and an agreement on loans for corporate purchase funds with the Defendant, a person who suffered damage pursuant to the credit guarantee agreement issued by the said Credit Guarantee Fund.

1. On March 9, 2010, the Defendant: (a) entered the details of the transaction in the office of the said corporation E; (b) entered the said corporation’s “DVCHIP” as stated in the facts charged of DVBD from F (State) and applied for a business loan in an amount equivalent to the said amount to the victim bank, even though there was no fact that the said corporation purchased DVCHIP; (c) connects the electronic data of “(state) fluort fluort fluort fluort fluort fluort fluort fluort fluort fluort fluort fluort fluort fluort fluend; and (d) applied for a business loan to the victim bank in an amount equivalent to the said amount.

The defendant deceivings the employees in charge of the victim bank as above and received 420 million won from the company's purchase fund to the account of the above (State) F on the same day from the victim bank, and then acquired the above money by means of receiving the above money from the account of the (State) E.

2. On August 5, 2010, the Defendant: (a) at the office of the foregoing Co., Ltd. E, the fact is clear that the said Co., Ltd.’s “MAIN CHIPF” as stated in the facts charged of the MAIN CHIP is a clerical error (see, e.g., evidence record 25 pages). Despite the absence of the fact of purchase, the Defendant connected the electronic computer of “(state)” (a system that mediates an application for a loan from a bank from a company) by an electronic commerce broker; and (b) followed the E Co., Ltd. in an amount equivalent to 300 million won from (State) F.

arrow