The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

In light of the following circumstances, the lower court sentenced the Defendant to imprisonment with prison labor for a period of two years and six months and a fine of three hundred thousand won.

The circumstances favorable: (a) the thief committed the thief in this case again during the period of repeated crime due to the same thief crime; (b) the method of the thief in which the thief committed the thief is professional and habitualized; (c) the thief in which the thief was driving again while driving and causing traffic accidents while driving; (d) some of the thiefs were recovered; (c) the victim of the thiefs was not injured; (d) the Defendant’s vehicle is covered by a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance and is able to compensate the victim of the traffic accident; and (e) other circumstances are considered under the summary of the Defendant’s wrongful argument of sentencing, taking into account the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, criminal record, motive and content of the crime; (e) the frequency and amount of the crime; and (e) the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court

The defendant confessions all the charges from the investigation stage to the court and reflects all the charges.

Some stolen goods have been restored to restore damage, and efforts have been made to restore damage to the remainder.

After causing an accident and escape, the defendant returned to the site after about one hour, and voluntarily surrenders to the judicial police officer.

Judgment

The fact that part of the stolen goods have been restored and the damage has already been restored, the sentencing of the court below seems to have been taken into account.

B. We examine the remainder of the circumstances alleged by the defendant.

According to the records, the defendant made a statement to the effect that he escaped from the scene of the accident on February 15, 2016 and returned to the scene of the accident on February 15, 2016 and returned to the scene of the accident at around 05:25 on that day, and that he saw him to the effect that he "the defendant had caused an accident and escaped because of heavy traffic control," and that he sought a light in confrontation with the victim.