logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.06.05 2019가단24983
대여금
Text

1. The defendant is jointly and severally with C, and the plaintiff.

(a) KRW 50,614,700 within the limit of KRW 93,50,00 and KRW 49.

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

(However, “creditor” and “debtor” shall be based on the judgment deemed to be a confession (Article 208(3)2 and Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act). 2. The Defendant submitted a written objection with the delivery of a payment order. However, the said written objection is merely stated in the purport of objection against the payment order, but the said written objection does not include specific details of the Plaintiff’s claim, and thus, the said written objection cannot be deemed as a reply pursuant to Article 256 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The defendant did not submit a document stating the subsequent answer to the purport that the defendant will submit a written recommendation of correction of this court, but did not submit a written statement indicating the defendant's assertion, such as the written reply or the briefs

The defendant did not appear on the designated date for pleading even after being notified of legitimate date.

Ultimately, the defendant is deemed to have led to the confession of the plaintiff's assertion of claim.

arrow