logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.09.04 2014고단4488
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:00 on May 15, 2014, the Defendant operated a marina business in the name of “C” with facilities such as 5th floor of the Seo-gu Incheon Building, 8 massage rooms and 1 shower rooms, and arranged the police officers to receive 100,000 won in the name of the price for the sexual traffic and allow the employees D to perform the act of similarity, as well as arranging to receive 100,000 won in the name of the price for the sexual traffic from February 18, 2014 to make the female employees receive 10,000 won in the name of the price for the sexual traffic and let them conduct the sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol regarding D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to entries in the records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Probation under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Sentencing (Scope of Recommendation) 19 years of age or older, the basic area (6 months to 1 year and 4 months) of the type 2 (mediation, etc. of sexual traffic due to the receipt, delivery, etc. of business prices) (excluding a special person) / suspended execution of sentence / 19 years of age or older / 19 years of age or older;

2. Although the defendant was sentenced twice to a fine in the same previous case, the sentence shall be determined as ordered within the scope of the sentencing guidelines recommended in full view of all sentencing data appearing in the records, such as the fact that there was no previous conviction, the fact that there was no criminal conviction exceeding the fine, the fact that the defendant commits a mistake, and the age, character, conduct and environment of the defendant.

arrow