logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2013.08.22 2013고단783
축산물위생관리법위반등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates a general restaurant in the name of "E" in Jeju City D, and the defendant B is a child of the above A. The slaughter, disposal, etc. of livestock shall be conducted at a place of work permitted by the competent authority, and it shall not sell livestock products with no mark of inspection by the inspector.

In addition, food service business operators shall not use livestock products that have not been inspected by an inspector for cooking.

However, the Defendants conspired to directly slaughter and dispose of pigs raised from G operated by F, which is an omission of the said A, on the grounds that the slaughter cost was spent in the event of slaughter at a slaughterhouse and the time of slaughter was high. The Defendants conspired to sell pigs after cooking the said restaurant.

The Defendants conspiredd as above, around May 29, 2013, at the above G located in Jeju-si, to slaughter the swine 1 ma by drawing the string to the said string, using the knife and knife, cut the pigs using a knife and knife, cut the pigs, sold the pigs after cooking and treating it as food at the above restaurant from January 2010 to the above temporary date, and sold the pigs 178 ma in the above manner.

As a result, Defendants conspired to slaughter livestock at a workplace without permission from the competent authorities, and sell livestock products without a mark of inspection passed by the inspector, and Defendant A, a food service business operator, violated the code of practice of food service business operators by using livestock products not inspected by the inspector in food cooking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a copy of the transaction account book, a detailed statement of account transactions in A and F, each field photo, E business report, records of seizure, and a list of seizure records;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

(a) Defendant A: Livestock Products Sanitary Control Act.

arrow