beta
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the grounds of appeal (fact-finding) ① The F teared the signature book of the Defendant in the facts charged of this case and submitted a signature book of not more than 38 pages of the investigation records in the same form. However, the Defendant did not have any factual part of the above signature book, it is probable that F would have made it ex post facto in order to be punished for the Defendant. Since the document book No. 1 submitted by the Defendant is the signature box of the clan, the Defendant did not manipulate the Defendant. ② The signature book of this case was written by a person who is not a clan for the purpose of ascertaining the number of persons with meals, not a clan document, but a clan document, and there is no legal effect of proving certain matters, and it does not constitute the object of the crime of property damage, and it does not constitute the object of the crime of property damage. ③ In light of the circumstances where half of the signature book of the Defendant had been taken by another member of the other clan at the time of this case, the judgment below convicting the Defendant of the facts charged of this case.
2. Determination
A. The judgment of the court below also states that the defendant's tear was not in the same form as the signature book of not more than 38 pages of investigation records, but the signature book of the evidence No. 1. The above evidence No. 1 was not completed and only in the supporting material for meal expenses disbursed after the general assembly, and the court below held that the defendant was not subject to the crime of causing property damage. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., the defendant was in custody at the investigation stage.
The reason why the evidence No. 1 was not submitted is that it was submitted to this court, and ② The defendant is investigated by the police, and ② The defendant is the name of the participants in this Court.
No. 300,000.