logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2015.10.20 2015고단1038
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From May 1, 2014 to May 26, 2014, the Defendant is a person who served as the president of the “C Child Care Center” at the State or public “C Child Care Center,” and the victim D is a child care center teacher who works as the head of C Child Care Center from May 1, 2014 to August 26, 2014.

1. On August 20, 2014, the Defendant, at around August 20, 2014, told that, “In the meeting of the head of the E Child Care Center (victim D) that had been in an influence of the captain of the Busan District (hereinafter referred to as the “Influence”) around August 20, 2014, the Defendant got the body of his child care center on the date of the evaluation certification to partly obstruct our child care center.”

However, in order to prevent the above child-care center from obtaining the evaluation certification, the victim did not have any part of the Appad, and there was no fact that there was any leakage in the toilet.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

2. On August 2014, the Defendant: (a) around August 2014, at the end of Busan District of its articles of incorporation, the Defendant: (b) stolen the safety certificate of a child-care center teacher, including F and G, from the end to the end of the end of August 2014, to the above child-care center teachers including F and G; and (c) then, (d) stolen the safety certificate of a child-care center’s play-on license to the Korean child-care center after his retirement; (b) stolen the documents to eliminate any interference with the evaluation certification of the child-care center; (c) “H child was re-employed immediately after his death; and (d) tried to work at the child-care center to intentionally make his/her death at the child-care center without any proper work at the C child-care center during the evaluation period; and (d) “original seafarer dismissed his/her children by inciting teachers and by joining the head of the child-care service.”

However, the victim did not have stolen the documents of C Child Care Center after the withdrawal, and there was a fact that C Child Care Center was re-employed in another Child Care Center from August 31, 2014 to November 2014.

arrow