beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 5,00,00 for each of the KRW 47,239,264 for Plaintiff C, and KRW 5,00,00 for Plaintiff A and Plaintiff B, and each of them on April 18, 2013.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. A. Around 08:45 on April 18, 2013, D driven a F25 passenger bus (hereinafter “Defendant bus”) from the front edge of the Defendant bus, while driving from 101 to 102 passenger buses around 104, the Plaintiff C (5 years in age at the time of the accident) was not found, and the front end of the Defendant bus was 10 meters away from the front edge of the Defendant bus without properly examining the front side and right side of the bus while driving from 101 to 102 passenger buses. Around 08:45, the Plaintiff C (5 years in age at the time of the accident) was not found, and the front side of the Defendant bus was 10 meters away from the body of Plaintiff C.
(이하 ‘이 사건 사고’라 한다). 이 사건 사고로 원고 C는 슬관절 전반부 연골손상, 슬관절 관절 손상, 대퇴부 원위부 손상, 우측 대퇴부 피부 결손, 하지의 으깸 손상 등의 상해를 입었다.
B. Plaintiff A and Plaintiff B are the parents of Plaintiff C, and the Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to Defendant bus.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, Eul evidence Nos. 1 (including branch numbers), video and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. According to the fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is responsible for compensating the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case as a mutual aid business operator who entered into a mutual aid agreement with the defendant bus.
B. According to the evidence and the purport of the entire pleadings as seen earlier prior to the limitation of liability, vehicles such as Defendant Bus or Child Care Center vans appear to have been running from time to time in order to board children, and Plaintiff C was merely a child of five years of age at the time of the instant accident. As such, Plaintiff A and Plaintiff B, the guardian of Plaintiff C, were negligent in protecting and supervising Plaintiff A and Plaintiff B so that they can safely escape from their infant care centers, and the negligence of Plaintiff A and Plaintiff B, the guardian, was at fault.