1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The defendant's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the argument of the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified even if the evidence submitted by the defendant to the court of first instance was presented to this court

Therefore, the reasoning for this court’s explanation is as follows, and this court’s reasoning is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for supplement of the judgment, which is in particular equivalent to that of paragraph (2), as the ground for appeal by the Defendant. Thus, this court’s reasoning is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

An abbreviationd name set forth in paragraph (1) of the judgment of the first instance shall be used below the same as it is.

[Supplementary or deleted parts] Part 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance: (a) the Plaintiff’s “Plaintiff” in Part 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be used as “A Co., Ltd. (A Co., Ltd. (A) was commenced on June 19, 2018 and the Plaintiff taken over the lawsuit; hereinafter “A”); and (b) all remainder except the Plaintiff’s “Plaintiff” from among “Plaintiffs” discharged from “A” shall be added to “A.”

Under the 7th judgment of the court of first instance, the "H requirements" of the 8 to 9 categories (including the number of parallels in the table of quoted entry) shall be raised as "H ownership".

No. 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be subject to the "Evidences 1 through 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance" with "Evidences 1 through 8, 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance."

The 12th judgment of the first instance court shall consist of the 14th to 17th judgment as follows:

Furthermore, it is recognized that the resolution of the board of directors submitted at the time of the instant pledge contract is not accompanied by the certificate of the director’s seal impression and was not notarized. Therefore, it is somewhat insufficient in the form of required documents submitted by A.

However, if the above evidence, in particular, evidence No. 7, and evidence No. 3 were presented in each of the above evidence No. 7 and evidence No. 3, three of five directors present at A's board of directors on May 19, 2008 and present at the above resolution of the board of directors.