logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 특허법원 2019.07.25 2018나2292
양수금등 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

(a) the conclusion of the bond acquisition contract and the payment of the bond amount 1) the Co-Defendant in the first instance instance Co-Defendant AB (hereinafter “Co-Defendant in the first instance”) are omitted, and “B” is called “B”.

[2] On May 26, 2016, R Co., Ltd. entered into a contract with B to acquire non-guaranteed private equity bonds issued by B in the form of 1,200,000,000 won (hereinafter “this case’s bond acquisition contract”) and paid the above bond amount.

3) At the time of the instant bond acquisition agreement, the LAB agreed to pay interest calculated at the rate of 4.825% per annum with the LAB, and to pay damages for delay at the rate of 10% per annum (10% per annum from the date of loss of due interest on the outstanding principal and interest of the bonds to the date of repayment) by the LAB’s credit information acquisition agreement with the LAB on May 26, 201, the principal and interest of the instant bond acquisition agreement with the LAB under the Asset-Backed Securitization Act, and the LA acquired the principal and interest of the bonds in accordance with the instant bond acquisition agreement with the LAB and all rights incidental thereto, which the LA had against the LAB.

2) On January 18, 2017, the credit management information following the default of tax payment was registered in relation to the LAB, and the LAB lost the benefit of time under the bond acquisition agreement of this case on the same day. (C) The LAB entered into the contract between the LAB and the Defendant, and the LAB directly operated the “O” and Q Q sales (hereinafter “instant business establishment”).

(b) it;

arrow