logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.05.10 2016고단444
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the business of driving a machine tank B.

On November 29, 2015, around 04:20 on November 29, 2015, the Defendant proceeds from the roads above the Gayang school located in 139, Seoyang school located in Gangseo-gu Seoul, Gangseo-gu, Gangseo-gu, Seoul, toward the south side from the northwest of the Gayang school toward the south side, and came to pass ahead of the exit quarter as the Olympic Games connected.

At this point, there was a safety zone and a protective wall to the point of a quarter. On the back of the defendant, the defendant C (43 years) was driving a D taxi, and thus the driver of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to check the right and the right of the front and the right of the front and to prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and continued to drive the string of the string of the string tank in front of the front part of the string of the string tank, and continued to receive the front part of the string tank which the said string victim drives.

Defendant at the same time caused injury to the victims G (37 years) who were on the same vehicle to undergo approximately 5 weeks’ treatment, such as 3 chest strekes, etc., which requires approximately 4 weeks’ treatment, to victims E (38 years) who were on board the taxi driven by C, without taking measures, such as rescueing the victim FF (36 years of age) who was on the same vehicle for about 5 weeks’ treatment. At the same time, the victim G (37 years of age) who was on the same vehicle suffered about 8,848,34 won repair rain, etc., which requires approximately 2 weeks’ treatment, and at the same time, the victim E (38 years of age) who was on the same vehicle did not immediately stop and stop the said taxi.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A traffic accident report and a report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of the written estimate for repair costs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

arrow