A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On April 26, 2013, at around 20:35, the Defendant driven Cco-rayed a vehicle with a blood alcohol content of about 500 meters at around 0.116% while under the influence of alcohol, from around 500 meters to the beginning of the implicit station in the same Dong located in the same Dong.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the result of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records and investigation reports (Attachment to judgment, etc.);

1. Relevant Article 148-2 (1) 2 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 148-2 (1) 2 of the Act on the Selection of Criminal Crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (i.e., the disposal of a vehicle while leaving the vehicle not to drive under the influence of alcohol, and the fact that the defendant's health is not good due to a heavy wind) is as follows: (i) the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a period of six months on January 25, 2007; (ii) two years from the suspension of the execution of six months on November 26, 2009; and (iii) two years from the suspension of the execution of six months on the same court on November 26, 2009 due to the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act; and (iv) the sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for a same kind of power, one time from the suspension of the execution of the execution of the execution of the sentence four times; (iv) however, it is inevitable to sentence a sentence of imprisonment with prison labor

However, the above punishment shall be determined in consideration of the reasons for discretionary mitigation.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.