The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On July 25, 2016, the Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C-A-A-Wd-Wd-Wd-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W

At night, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by thoroughly manipulating the steering time and accurately manipulating the steering and steering devices for those engaged in driving of a motor vehicle at night.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to proceed so and thereby, received the part of the bridge of the Victim F (55) crossing the road from the left side of the running direction of the Defendant to the right side of the road.

After all, the Defendant suffered injury to the above victim due to the above occupational negligence, which caused the injury to the victim during the incomplete death due to the damage to the scale of the injury.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the victim withdraws his wish to punish the defendant after the indictment of this case was instituted.