logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2020.07.22 2020고정60
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 17, 2019, the Defendant driven a low-speed car volume B around 20:0 on November 17, 2019, and driven the 15 high-quality stability industry road from the border distance to the white-speed distance to the high-speed speed.

In such a case, the defendant engaged in driving has a duty of care to safely drive the steering by properly manipulating the steering gear and the steering system while living well before and after the accident, because it is not secured at night time.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to stop down on the road which was opened by the Defendant, and continued to use two street lamps, etc. on the right side of the course, which were located on the right side of the course, as the front part of the road in the direction of the course, and received a central separation zone from the two places.

The Defendant destroyed the above structure by negligence in the course of business as seen above, thereby putting the street, etc. over the road and scattered the accident risk on the road, but did not immediately take necessary measures after the accident, and escaped the above vehicle at the site of the accident.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a traffic accident actual condition investigation report, a criminal investigation report (the initial reporter's telephone conversation), and a criminal investigation report (related to a written estimate for damage);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Considerations such as the fact that damage was compensated for by reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order and the fact that the risk of the secondary accident was very high due to the defendant's non-measures

arrow