The judgment below

The part of the defendant's case shall be reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six years.

The defendant shall be 120 hours.

1. On the part of the Defendant case, the lower court rendered a judgment that dismissed the prosecutor’s request regarding the part regarding the Defendant case and the part regarding the case regarding the attachment order claim.

Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 9 (8) of the Act on Probation and Electronic Monitoring, etc. of Specific Criminal Offenders as there is no benefit in appeal as to the part of the claim for attachment order filed only by the defendant, this part shall be excluded from the scope of the party members' inquiry.

2. Summary of grounds for appeal;

가. 사실오인 내지 법리오해 1) 피고인은 이 사건 각 공소사실 기재와 같은 범행을 저지른 바 없다. 피고인의 의붓딸인 피해자의 고소와 수사기관 및 원심법정에서의 각 진술은 피해자의 남자 친구 및 그 부모들의 꾐에 빠져 피고인을 모함하고 피고인의 재산을 차지할 목적으로 행한 것으로 그 모두가 허위이다. 2) 아울러, 피해자의 고소와 수사기관 및 원심법정에서의 각 진술은 그 범행일시와 장소, 범행 방법, 범행 전후의 정황 등에 있어 일관성이 없을 뿐만 아니라 그 신빙성도 없다.

3) Therefore, the victim’s complaint and each statement in the investigative agency and the court below’s decision cannot be deemed as evidence of guilt, and the remaining evidence cited by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to find the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged. B. The sentence imposed by the court below of unfair sentencing (the imprisonment of eight years is too unreasonable) is too unreasonable.

3. Determination

A. Part 1 of assertion of misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles) Whether the victim's complaint and each statement in the investigation agency and the court of original instance are false or not, the defendant and his defense counsel are mainly based on a written statement prepared and submitted by the victim to the prosecution (Evidence No. 2, No. 404 of the Evidence Records, conversation exchanged with the defendant at the time of meeting with the defendant, and statements in the victim's trial court.