logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2012.10.19 2012고단4571
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 8, 2012, at around 20:30, the Defendant: (a) while drinking alcohol with E, etc. at a D restaurant located in the Busan-gu Busan-gu, Busan-do, the Defendant: (b) stated, “this year walkno and dysleno” to the victim on the ground that the victim F (the age 61) wns together with G while drinking alcohol; (c) “The victim walkno and dysleno,” and (d) the victim’s head, etc. at one time, once, and the victim’s head, etc. can be carried out; and (d) the Defendant continued to take the part of the victim’s shoulder on the D restaurant in front of the D restaurant, while the Defendant walked the victim’s head, part of the victim’s hair with his hand, and made the victim’s chest’s chest so long as the victim’s chest was pushed up by his hand.

As a result, the Defendant, together with E, inflicted injury on the victim, such as cerebral ley that requires medical treatment for about four weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F and H;

1. A complaint and a complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (to attach a copy of the report on investigation (to be accompanied by the hearing of statements by first responders, first responders, first responders, and first responders, and copies of

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion on the relevant Article of the relevant criminal facts and Article 2(2) and (1)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the defendant and his/her defense counsel, asserts that the defendant merely took the victim out of a restaurant while speaking the victim and G fighting, and that the defendant did not assault the victim jointly with E.

In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court: (a) the victim stated that, immediately after the accident, at the time when the 119 first responder was dispatched to the scene, “the South Korean Peninsula was met; (b) the 119 first responds to the body of the victim (Evidence No. 86 pages); and (c) the victim made the victim’s 119 first respond to the I Hospital’s intention by the 119 first responder;

The bones and head of the malill are disturbing.

arrow