A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 2, 2016, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Busan District Court's Dong branch branch on September 2, 2016, and on March 31, 2008, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Busan District Court's Dong branch branch.

1. On October 19, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking and without a license), without obtaining a driver’s license, driven a motor vehicle, etc. under the influence of alcohol by 0.153%, while under the influence of alcohol in blood, the Defendant: (a) was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on at least 0.153%; (b) from the front side of the selling market of Suwon-dong, Busan; and (c) from the front side of the road of 741-ro, the 1km amounting to the road front of the narrow-gu, Suwon-dong, Busan; and (d) was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on at least two occasions.

2. On October 19, 2016, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) around 05:40 on the road in front of the above narrowness math, and (b) on the road in front of the crackdown on drinking drivers, the Defendant, without the Defendant’s consent, given E, a resident registration number of the Defendant’s pro-friendly D resident registration number, without the Defendant’s consent, in order to verify the identity of the drinking drivers.

3. On October 19, 2016, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) around 05:50 on the road in front of the aforementioned narrowness Mart, 2016; (b) the Defendant was under heavy criminal punishment; (c) stated Defendant D’s name and resident registration number to Defendant C; and (d) without authority for the purpose of exercising the report on the circumstances of the driver in charge; and (c) stated “the column for driver’s confirmation” in “the person himself/herself, as a person subject to revocation of the license, confirmed that the above stated contents were the same as the fact; (d) signed on D under the phrase “the person was notified of blood collection if he/she is recognized as the result of the measurement; and (d) forged a copy of the driver’s report on the circumstances of the driver’s statement in the name of D, a private document on proof of the fact.

A defendant shall have authority for the purpose of continuing his exercise.