Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of village buses three times of love transport.

On January 25, 2014, the Defendant driven the above village bus around 22:26, and led the four-lanes of the four-lane road in front of the fire station in the Gopo-ro, Gopo-si, Si, Gunpo-si, Seoul, to a speed of about 30 km in the direction of fire-fighting distance.

However, since there are crosswalks where signal lights are installed on the front door, there was a duty of care to confirm whether a person engaged in driving service is a person who gets on a way to reduce the speed and to see well the front door, and to drive safely in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the victim D (the age of 17) who dried the crosswalk from the left-hand side of the Defendant’s proceeding to the right-hand side in accordance with the pedestrian signals as the front side of the village bus.

Ultimately, at around 05:20 on the 26th day of the same month, the Defendant caused the victim to die with cerebral mathy due to climatic blood and cerebral cerebral ma at the Gelim University Gegi Hospital.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Comprehensive traffic accident analysis report by the Road Traffic Authority;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a death certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the grounds of sentencing is that the defendant, as a community bus engineer, violated the signal and violated the duty of pedestrian protection by gross negligence, has yet to become the victim's life without any mistake. The nature of the crime is very heavy.

In this context, the defendant actively denied the fact that it is not an accident of the signal violation crosswalk in the first and second investigations by the police.