logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 논산지원 2018.12.21 2018고단439
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of each of the above penalties for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person engaging in driving a vehicle QM3.

On March 17, 2018, at around 22:51, the Defendant driven the above car and proceeded at the speed of 155.4km in the direction of giving two-lane roads near the oil station in E, which are located in D, designated by the Defendant.

There is a duty of care to ensure safe operation by a person engaged in driving service, who is a road of 80 km per hour of restriction.

Nevertheless, the defendant's body was shocked by the victim F (48 tax) who walked a road in the same direction as the end when it was due to the negligence that belongs to about 75 km than the speed limit, with the front right side of the car.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from an occupational negligence of the above victim a diversative damage that requires a dateless treatment.

2. Defendant B is a person who is engaged in driving a G Ttiball car.

On March 17, 2018, the Defendant proceeded along two lanes in the direction of allowing two lanes near the station of oil in E, which are located in D around the 22:53 around the 17th 2018.

A person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to drive safely by accurately operating steering steering steering gear and brakes, which well sees the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not look at the front side properly and did not discover the victim F who was seated in the second two-lane due to the same accident as the paragraph 1, and did not look at the front side of the above vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant caused the death of the victim due to the diversified damage while transferring the victim to a hospital due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A traffic accident analysis appraisal report and a autopsy appraisal report;

1. Fact-finding survey report and report on the occurrence of any traffic accident;

1.The vehicles of witnesses;

arrow