logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2013.06.03 2013고정1409
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2.2 million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 9, 2013, the Defendant found 10,000 won of taxi expenses in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, operated by the injured party B, who was a usual eye while drinking alcohol around 20:30 on April 9, 2013.

The Defendant interfered with the victim’s business operation by force, such as: (a) the Defendant, on the ground that the victim was unable to lend money; (b) obstructed the victim’s business by force, by blocking the entrance door of the said “Cmart” for about one hour from around 21:30 of the same day; and (c) preventing customers who were trying to use the said Mmart from entering by blocking the disturbance by her hand and her mack.

『2013고정1410』 피고인은 2013. 4. 10. 02:30경 서울 동대문구 D이라는 음식점 내에서, 그곳 종업원으로 일하는 피해자 E에게 ‘네가 나를 경찰에 신고한 것 아니냐’라고 항의하던 중 피해자가 ‘야야라고 부르지 말고 아줌마라고 부르라’고 한다는 이유로 손님 2~3명이 듣고 있는 가운데 피해자에게 “야 이년아, 씨발년아, 니가 뭐 잘났냐, 뭣 같은 년, 사장하고 붙어 처먹고 주인행세를 하느냐”라고 큰소리로 말하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

[2013 High Court Decision 1409]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to B (2013, 1410);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to E and F;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow