logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.02.09 2016고단2265
보조금관리에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a professor working for D University, Art, Culture, University, Design, or College of D University.

From June 1, 2010 to December 31, 2013, the Defendant participated in the research with F’s team lighting design administrator, a supervising agency, in the projects subsidized project costs by the Institute for Promotion of Information and Communications Technology Industry under the Knowledge Economy Department (the present and future Creative Science Department).

The Defendant, while participating in the foregoing research that is operated with the State subsidy, drafted a quotation, tax invoice, transaction statement, etc. by unrecovering the cost of the manufacture of a master organization's prototype, based on which the Defendant applied for the payment of subsidies to the manufacturing company of the said prototype, and decided that the difference would be refunded to the account of his researcher, etc.

Accordingly, the Defendant requested the above company to issue a tax invoice, etc. of KRW 17 million for two times, even though the production cost of four smart lighting processing prototypes was required by G company in around October 2010 in relation to the production of the above lighting fixture's prototype, and requested the above company to provide subsidies of KRW 17 million for the above company, accompanied by its tax invoice, and received subsidies of KRW 6,861,200 among them from G company from the above date to December 2013, 2013, and received subsidies of KRW 67,329,200 in total by the same method as shown in the list of crimes, as shown in the attached Table.

As a result, the Defendant received subsidies by false application or other unlawful means.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness H, I, and J;

1. Statement made by each prosecutor with respect to K, I, L, and M;

1. Each police statement protocol on N,O, P, Q, and R;

1. Statement or account transaction statement of S;

1. Investigation report (Submission of details of the M transaction for reference) and account transaction;

1. An investigation report (in relation to the place of use of eight million won or more deposited by G Company I, accompanied by the data submitted by K);

arrow