logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.12.11 2015고단1909
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud;

A. On April 11, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E’s house located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government D apartment 1, 311, stating, “The father and the father will be divorced immediately and divorced, but the house to live together with the victim after marriage was entered into a joint agreement with the victim as F, and the money was transferred by the Cti Bank as the money falls short of the money.”

However, the fact is that the defendant was living together with four wife and children at the time, and there was no intention to marry with the victim, and there was no intention to marry with the victim, and there was no fact that a housing sales contract was concluded.

The Defendant had the victim obtain a loan of KRW 25,300,000 from the CT Bank, and then received a total of KRW 28,500,000,000 including the above money from the victim’s G account in the name of G, as a housing purchase fund.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

B. On May 12, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim stating that “I will pay money to the victim within three million won if I will temporarily lend a credit card. I will also pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay.”

However, the Defendant, at the time, did not pay the unpaid amount of KRW 45,00,00 and did not have any intention or ability to pay the unpaid amount, even if using a credit card in the name of the victim, because the Defendant had been able to use the bank account under the name of the Defendant while residing in a place other than his/her domicile on his/her resident registration, and there was no certain income. Therefore, the Defendant was thought to receive cash by using the above credit card.

The Defendant received the BC card from the victim, namely, at the seat, and settled KRW 2,00,000 in the United Nations case on the same day.

arrow