Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the business director of (State) P, (State) Q who produces safety facilities, such as road Arails, and Defendant B is the business director of (State) P and (State) Q.

R worked in the Road Management Department S of the Incheon City General Construction Headquarters from August 25, 2011 to February 23, 2014, while performing duties, such as designing and reinforcement works, inspecting materials, construction supervision, etc., ordered by the said comprehensive construction headquarters. From February 24, 2014, in the Jung-gu Regional Development Bureau traffic administration and T in Incheon Metropolitan City, it performed the duties of maintaining traffic-related facilities.

U worked as a public official from September 17, 2013 to January 1, 2015, while serving as the team leader at the road management department S of the said general construction headquarters, performed the duties of designing and reinforcement of facilities, inspecting materials, supervising construction, etc. ordered by the said comprehensive construction headquarters. From January 2, 2015, from around January 2, 2015, U performed the duties of supervising construction ordered by the said comprehensive construction headquarters, while serving as V from Part I to Part V of the facilities of the Urban Railroad Construction Headquarters in Incheon City.

1. On November 22, 2013, Defendant A offered entertainment equivalent to KRW 1,042,00,000 in total, upon soliciting that the Defendant’s sole criminal conduct reflects the design to use the protective fence produced in Q, which was ordered by the aforementioned General Construction Headquarters to the said R and U, in the limited-type professional store “X” and the room-end Y in the Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Yeonsu-gu.

Accordingly, the Defendant provided a bribe equivalent to KRW 1,042,00 in total in relation to the duties of public officials.

2. On January 2014, Defendants B demanded KRW 20 million in return for reflecting the design to use the “Saman Senior Guard Maintenance Works” that was ordered by the public officials in charge of the General Construction Headquarters of the Incheon City Construction Headquarters from Defendant A to the “Saman Senior Guard Maintenance Work”, which was ordered by the above General Construction Headquarters.