logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.09.28 2017고정2184
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The facts charged in the indictment are stated that the defendant's provision of electricity and water supply to the victim's store was obstructed. However, in light of the facts acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, the defendant seems to have obstructed only the "electric", and it is reasonable to view the "water supply" as a clerical error, so there is a substantial disadvantage to the defendant's right to defend

To the extent that it does not appear, the instant facts charged was partly revised ex officio.

The Defendant is the representative of the Incheon Southern-gu B Building Management Committee, and the victim C is a person who has occupied the said store by winning an auction on May 26, 2016 in order to operate the real estate consulting office.

B The Committee on Building Management provides electricity and water supply for the occupants while dealing with the overall affairs for the occupants before and after the relocation of the office, and deals with the management of parking lots, including sections for exclusive use, and the management of access to building.

On May 2016, the Defendant prevented electricity supplied to the said 304 stores from May 2016 to October 2016, by taking advantage of the fact that the Defendant was the general manager in charge of the management of the said building at the said B building office and was in a position to start and suspend the supply of electricity, on the ground that the newly occupied victim did not pay KRW 24 million for the management expenses in arrears for the previous tenants for a six-year period from the end of the said year to the end of the said year.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the operation of the victim's office by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by each prosecution with respect to C and D;

1. An objection to a disposition of the price of gold at 2016Kahap 242, the Incheon District Court's decision to dispose of the gold at 2016Kahap 242, the Incheon District Court's indirect compulsory decision, the Incheon District Court's 2016Kahap 242;

1. Investigative Report (2016 A. 230279, hereinafter referred to as the 2016 A. 30279, hereinafter referred to as the litigant

arrow