beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 7,236,60, and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from April 7, 2015 to November 12, 2015.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. In around the end of 2012, the Plaintiff obtained permission for construction (hereinafter “instant construction”) from the head of the wife’s population level C and 463 square meters, respectively, to newly construct two factory buildings (hereinafter “instant building”) on the ground (hereinafter “instant land”) on the land from the head of the wife’s population level at the time of the horse-si, Gambing-si (hereinafter “instant land”). In addition, the Plaintiff obtained permission for construction as the owner of the instant construction (hereinafter “instant construction”) to build two factory buildings (hereinafter “instant building”), 129.6 square meters, 129.4 square meters, 2 stories, 105.84 square meters, 3 stories, 105.84 square meters, 2 stories, and 2 stories: general steel-framed structure dives, dives, 2 stories, 1 stories, and 2 stories; hereinafter “instant factory building”).
B. On November 26, 2013, the Plaintiff’s husband D contracted to Nonparty F, who had engaged in the construction business with the trade name “E”, with the construction cost of KRW 310 million for the instant construction project and the construction period from November 26, 2013 to March 30, 2014.
C. F began the instant construction work through a large number of subcontractors, and the Defendant contracted for steel construction among the instant construction works from F to January 14, 2014, and performed the construction work from F to F during the period from December 2013, 2014, and transferred the part of the construction work completed around that time to F.
The Plaintiff paid F, as the instant construction cost, KRW 150 million on December 3, 2013, KRW 150 million, KRW 1500 million on February 10, 2014, KRW 350 million on March 17, 2014, and KRW 350 million on March 17, 2014, and thereafter, F, around April 2014, was under contact with the subcontractor including the Defendant, without paying the subcontract price.
E. Accordingly, the Plaintiff paid additional construction cost to some subcontractors, and performed the remainder on its own, and completed the instant construction work on June 2014.
F. At around 8:00 a.m. on June 11, 2014, the Defendant intruded into the instant factory building without permission, affixed a banner at the entrance of the right of retention, and replaced the correction device of the said building.