All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant 1’s misunderstanding of facts (1) (the obscenity of a public performance obscenity) does not directly go out of his clothes, but in order to have his clothes off from the robbery and to seek assistance, and the light is viewed as a gas station, and thus there is no intention of public performance obscenity.

(2) The sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentencing (one year of imprisonment, 40 hours of order to complete a sexual assault treatment program) is too unreasonable.

B. According to the prosecutor’s (1) misunderstanding of facts (a) and the victim’s investigation agency’s statement, the fact that the Defendant had a knife, a dangerous object at the time of assaulting the victim is sufficiently recognized.

(2) The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 피고인의 사실 오인 주장에 관한 판단 피고인이 이 사건 공연 음란 범행 당시 현장에 있던 사람들에게 경찰에 신고 해 줄 것을 요청하기는 하였으나, 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 알 수 있는 다음과 같은 사정, 즉 ① 피고인은 피고인의 옷이 있던 장소에서 주유소까지 올 때 뛰어 오지 않고 팔짱을 낀 채 도로를 배회하면서 걸어왔고, 주유소에 도착한 후에도 경찰이 올 때까지 주위를 배회하고 있었는 바, 이러한 태도는 강도 피해를 당한 일반적인 피해자의 모습이라고 보기 어려운 점, ② 피고인은 경찰이 피고인의 옷을 찾아와서 입으라

In full view of the fact that the Defendant refused to put in clothes even though he did not want to do so, the lower court’s judgment that found the Defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged is justifiable.

B. As to the prosecutor’s assertion of mistake of facts, the Defendant consents to the investigation report prepared by the victim of special assault, the police statement prepared by the victim, and the victim’s statement prepared by the prosecutor as evidence.