The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are some favorable circumstances for the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant, as the first offender, was divided in depth and reflects the defendant's mistake, the defendant received mental treatment from around 2005 due to bullying in school early 2005, there were symptoms such as mental fission and exchange, and such symptoms seems to have influenced the defendant's crime of this case, the crime of this case is a case where the crime of this case is placed in the victim's entrance, which had been prepared in advance about 10 months after her growth, and the method and contents of the crime were limited to not only the first offender but also against the infant who is unable to resist any resistance, and thus, the crime was considerably serious, and the defendant did not receive a letter from the victim or agreed to do so from the victim up to now, and there were symptoms such as mental fission and exchange, and it appears that such symptoms had influenced the defendant's criminal act of this case, and the crime of this case was committed in favor of the defendant's social character and behavior, and there were no other reasons to apply the sentencing guidelines and records of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.