beta
Text
Defendant
In addition, all appeals filed by the respondent for the attachment order, the requester for the protective order, and the prosecutor are dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. Although the defendant and the person who requested the attachment order, the person who requested the attachment order, the person who requested the attachment order, the person who requested the order to observe the protective order (hereinafter the defendant) committed an indecent act by taking advantage of the victim E and F, who are children of friendship, using the state of impossibility of resistance, the court below convicted all the charges on this part of the charges on the basis of the victim E and F’s statement, etc. The court below erred in the misapprehension of facts.
2) The lower court’s improper sentencing is too unreasonable.
B. The lower court’s sentencing is too uncomfortable.
2. Determination
A. Part 1 of the case concerning the defendant's assertion that the defendant's mistake of facts was identical to that of the above facts in the court below, and the court below rejected the above assertion by giving a detailed statement on the decision.
Examining the following circumstances, which were duly adopted and examined by the court below in light of the circumstances revealed by the court below, the court below’s determination is justifiable, and the defendant’s above assertion is without merit.
A) Before reporting the Defendant who is the father of the victim E to the police, the victim E divided the conversation between the victim F and T, who is the same father, and “The victim E was 2 times a sexual indecent act committed by the Defendant at the elementary school student, and was too large, and was deprived of his memory until the victim F.
It discussed to the effect that fake body was left off, and further detailed and consistent statement was made on the main part of the crime to the investigation agency and the court of original instance.
B) The victim F was in the process of the instant Telecommunication with the victim E, and “The Defendant was farced by the victim F, who was drinking.”
The victim F was playing in the Defendant’s room (the Old Plaos, the old Plaos.), but the victim F was able to be placed on the side of the victim F.