Text
1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.
(a) Of the real estate listed in the separate sheet, the Attached Map 1, 2, 3, 4 and 1.
Reasons
1. On April 18, 2013, the Plaintiff indicated the claim (C had been named as D, and the name was changed again in the current name) leased real estate indicated in the attached list from E and sub-leaseed to the Defendant on June 5, 2014, by setting the deposit amount of KRW 80,000,000 and the monthly rent of KRW 550,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,
However, the Defendant paid only the rent up to November 2014 and did not pay the rent thereafter. Accordingly, on January 28, 2016, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant of the termination of the said sub-lease contract on the grounds of two or more rents.
Therefore, the defendant is obligated to deliver the above 80 square meters to the plaintiff and pay the overdue car to the plaintiff.
2. Judgment by service (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).
3. The Plaintiff’s partial dismissal of the Plaintiff sought arrears from October 5, 2014, but is the person who received the rent from November 2014. As such, the Plaintiff’s demand for overdue rent from October 5, 2014 to December 4, 2014 is without merit.