logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.12.03 2014가합504538
공사대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) UNNM Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “NNM”)

) The Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yongsan-gu, and 773-1, and 10, above the third and third underground floors above the third and third floors above the ground of Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, and the third and fifth generation Hannam National University (hereinafter “Korea National University Loans”).

(3) A new corporation is an executor of the new corporation and a joint corporation (hereinafter referred to as “joint”)

(2) On April 13, 201, NNNM, Yangyang, and A (hereinafter “A”) concluded a sales agency agreement with A to delegate the sales of the instant loan (hereinafter “the instant loan”) with 12 households (hereinafter “the instant loan”) out of the Korea Development Bank loan (hereinafter “the instant loan”) on April 13, 201, on the part of the Korea Development Bank Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Korea Development Bank”). The sales agency agreement was concluded to delegate the sales of the instant loan to A, and the said loan was not sold without the purchaser’s absence.

3) On May 10, 2012, UNM completed the registration of initial ownership relating to the instant loan, and thereafter, the Defendant purchased the instant loan on October 18, 2012, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on December 14, 2012. (B) On February 19, 2013, the Defendant concluded a construction contract between the Defendant and the Plaintiff to enter into between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff for the contract and the registration of ownership transfer on December 14, 2012. (3) On February 19, 2013, the Defendant entered into a contract between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff for the construction of the instant loan at KRW 2,524,50,000, the date of completion, and the date of completion, on April 30, 2013, and every number of days, to conclude a contract for the construction of the instant loan at the rate of 1/100 of the contract

(2) On April 2013, the Defendant proposed that the Plaintiff change the contractor of the relevant interior works into a specialized constructor due to the lack of expertise in the construction works as a securities company, and the Plaintiff consented to the change of the contractor of the relevant interior works into a specialized constructor.

(c)a sales agency contract, a contract, or

arrow