logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.12.07 2018고단3958
폭행치상
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant and the victim C (V, 83 years old) are patients hospitalized in the "E Hospital" 207 heading room in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju due to the symptoms of garrison, etc.

At around 06:30 on April 27, 2018, the Defendant promised an empty 207 room from the front corridor of the said convalescent hospital 207, and F, a patient at the place, has first been dissatisfied with the said bed and f with a complaint that he/she occupied the said bed and f with a sound, and the witness f is not able to give a sound to F, who is not able to return home to the Defendant.

In the event of resistance, the victim was fighting with his body, such as being pushed in his body with his body.

During that, the defendant was able to find the victim again even though she was satisfed by a nurse in his/her place, he/she would be able to find the victim again. In the front corridor of the 207 heading room, the defendant was satisfing the body of the victim, satching the body of the victim, and satfing the victim.

As a result, the Defendant committed assault against the victim, thereby resulting in injury to the victim, such as cutting down the right pelle, cutting down the right pelle, cutting down the right pelle, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect C by the police;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Each statement of C and H;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs (2)

1. Articles 262, 260 (1), and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. As to the Defendant’s defense counsel’s assertion under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (see, e.g., the fact that the Defendant suffered from a disease, such as dementia, in the detailed name of the Defendant at the time of the instant crime, and that the victim was the Defendant’s wife by agreement with the victim, and that there was no previous conviction). As such, the Defendant was in a state of mental and physical weakness due to this reason.

The argument is asserted.

However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the evidence is examined.

arrow