The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, around May 9, 2015, around 18:30 on the street B in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, had the victim C (62 Does) applied a daily construction distance to another person without being aware of the victim C (62 Does) and had the victim registered a business operator to make a deduction of the company’s money.

In doing a bath theory, the victim abused the victim by breathing him/her over the floor, destroying the victim’s face and body by drinking and sprinking him/her, etc.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. Since a written withdrawal of complaint, which expressed the victim’s intent not to be punished, was submitted to this court on the second public trial date, the instant public prosecution was dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.